[1]郭和坤,刘强,李海波,等.四川盆地侏罗系致密储层孔隙结构特征[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2013,30(No.3(221-330)):306-312.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2013.03306]
 Guo Hekun,Liu Qiang,Li Haibo,et al.Microstructural characteristics of the Jurassic tight oil reservoirs in Sichuan Basin[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2013,30(No.3(221-330)):306-312.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2013.03306]
点击复制

四川盆地侏罗系致密储层孔隙结构特征()
分享到:

《深圳大学学报理工版》[ISSN:1000-2618/CN:44-1401/N]

卷:
第30卷
期数:
2013年No.3(221-330)
页码:
306-312
栏目:
环境与能源
出版日期:
2013-05-19

文章信息/Info

Title:
Microstructural characteristics of the Jurassic tight oil reservoirs in Sichuan Basin
文章编号:
20130314
作者:
郭和坤123刘强12李海波23孟智强12白永旺4
1) 中国科学院渗流流体力学研究所,河北 廊坊 065007
2) 中国科学院大学 物理学院,北京 100049
3) 中国石油勘探开发研究院廊坊分院,河北 廊坊 065007
4) 大庆油田采油二厂地质大队,黑龙江 大庆 163000
Author(s):
Guo Hekun123 Liu Qiang12 Li Haibo23 Meng Zhiqiang12 and Bai Yongwang4
1) Institute of Porous Flow and Fluid Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Science, Langfang 065007, Heibei Province, P.R.China
2) School of Physics, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, P.R.China
3) Research Institute of Petroluem Explortion & Development-Langfang, CNPC, Langfang 065007, Heibei Province, P.R.China
4) Geologic sector of No.2 Oil Production Plant, Petrochina Daqing Oilfield, Daqing 163000, Heilongjiang Province, P.R.China
关键词:
油气层物理四川盆地致密油藏孔隙度渗透率饱和度孔隙结构核磁共振
Keywords:
petrophysics Sichuan Basin tight reservoirs porosity permeability saturation pore structure nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR)
分类号:
TE 311
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1249.2013.03306
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
运用常规岩芯分析法、核磁共振T2弛豫谱法和气水高速离心法,研究四川盆地致密油藏储层孔隙结构特征,得到一系列岩芯饱和水状态及束缚水状态下岩芯T2谱,分析致密油藏储层孔隙结构类型、孔隙度及可动流体饱和度等特征,确定了致密砂岩的渗透率系数CT2截止值.研究结果表明,T2谱能定性反映岩芯的孔隙类型,致密石灰岩为孔隙型储层和孔隙-裂缝型储层;致密砂岩为孔隙型储层,且以小孔隙为主,中大孔隙为辅,仅少量岩芯发育有微裂缝,改善了储层渗透性;致密砂岩与石灰岩气测孔隙度均值分别为4.88%和1.93%,核磁孔隙度一般小于气测孔隙度与水测孔隙度;流体可动性随渗透率、喉道半径和致密岩心类型等不同而异;致密砂岩和石灰岩的T2截止值、渗透率系数均小于常用值.
Abstract:
The pore structure, porosity, fluid saturation, T2 cut-off values and permeability coefficients for tight formations are studied in this paper in order to discover the microstructural characteristics of the tight reservoirs. A series of experimental methods, including conventional core analysis, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and high-speed centrifugal separation of gas and water, are applied to obtain the T2 spectrum of water-saturated cores and cores under different centrifugal force. It is found that T2 spectrum can indicate the type of pore in cores. The pore type for tight limestone is pore reservoirs and pore-fracture reservoirs. The pore type for tight sandstone is pore reservoirs and the majority of pores are small pores, with some middle or large pores. Only a few cores have micro-fracture which can significantly improve the permeability. The average gas porosity for tight sandstone and tight limestone is 4.88% and 1.93%, respectively. The porosity obtained by NMR is less than gas porosity and water porosity. The average T2 cut-off values for tight sandstone and tight limestone is 4.25 ms and 11.54 ms, respectively. The average permeability coefficient for tight sandstone and tight limestone is 2.35 and 0.22, respectively. The T2 cut-off values and permeability coefficient are both less than the conventional values.

参考文献/References:

[1] Aguilera R. Flow units: from conventional to tight gas to shale gas reservoirs[C]// Trinidad and Tobago Energy Resources Conference. Port of Spain (Trinidad): Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2010: SPE132845.
[2] Dessort D, Gelin F, Duclerc D, et al. Enhanced assessment of the distribution of organic matter in unconventional plays and tarmat in reservoirs using a new laser pyrolysis method on core[C]// Abu Dhabi International Petroleum Conference and Exhibition. Abu Dhabi(UAE): Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2012: SPE161626.
[3] Bora Oz, David Braun, Sanjay Vitthal, et al, Practical insights and benefits of integrating technology into exploration, appraisal and development of unconventional gas and liquid rich shale reservoirs[C]// 2013 SPE Middle East Unconventional Gas Conference & Exhibition. Muscat (Oman): Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2013: SPE 163988.
[4] Dong Z, Holditch S A, McVay DA, et al. Global unconventiona resource assessment[J]. SPE Economics & Management, 2012, 4(4): 222-234.
[5] Elijah O Odusina,Carl H Sondergeld,Chandra Shekhar Rai, An NMR Study of Shale Wettability[C]// Canadian Unconventional Resources Conference, Alberta (Canada):Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2011: SPE147371.
[6] Zhai Guangming. Petroleum Geology of China (Vol. 10): Sichuan Oil and Gas Area[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press,1989.(in Chinese)
翟光明.中国石油地质志(卷10): 四川油气区[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1989.
[7] Zou Caineng, Tao Shizhen, Hou Lianhua, et al. Unconvetional Petroleum Geology[M]. Beijing: Geological Publishing House, 2011.(in Chinese)
邹才能,陶士振,侯连华,等.非常规油气地质[M].北京:地质出版社,2011.
[8] Zhao Lun,Chen Yefei,Ning Zhengfu, et al, Stress sensitive experiments for abnormal overpressure carbonate reservoirs: a case from the Kenkiyak low-permeability fractured-porous oilfield in the littoral Caspian Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(2): 194-200.(in Chinese)
赵伦,陈烨菲,宁正福,等. 异常高压碳酸盐岩油藏应力敏感实验评价——以滨里海盆地肯基亚克裂缝-孔隙型低渗透碳酸盐岩油藏为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(2): 194-200.
[9] Guo Ping, Zhang Maolin, Huang Quanhua, et al. Research on the Development Mechanism of the Low Permeability Tight Sandstone Gas Reservoir[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2009.(in Chinese)
郭平,张茂林,黄全华,等.低渗透致密砂岩气藏开发机理研究[M].北京:石油工业出版社,2009.
[10] Wu Xiaoqi, Huang Shiping, Liao Fengrong, et al. Carbon isotopic compositions of coal-derived gas in the Xujiahe Formation and Jurassic in the Sichuan Basin[J].Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2011, 38(4):418-427.(in Chinese)
吴小奇,黄士鹏,廖凤蓉,等.四川盆地须家河组及侏罗系煤成气碳同位素组成[J].石油勘探与开发,2011,38(4):418-427.
[11] Ning Ning, Wang Hongyan, Yong Hong, et al. Unconventional natural gas resources and their exploitation technologies in China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(9):9-12.(in Chinese)
宁宁,王红岩,雍洪,等.中国非常规天然气资源基础与开发技术[J].天然气工业,2009, 29(9):9-12.
[12] Zou Caineng, Zhu Rukai, Wu Songtao, et al. Types, characteristics, genesis and prospects of conventional and unconventional hydrocarbon accumulations: taking tight oil and tight gas in China as an instance[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(2): 173-187.(in Chinese)
邹才能,朱如凯,吴松涛,等. 常规与非常规油气聚集类型、特征、机理及展望——以中国致密油和致密气为例[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(2): 173-187.
[13] Jia Chengzao, Zou Caineng, Li Jianzhong, et al. Assessment criteria,main types,basic features and resource prospects of the tight oil in China[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2012, 33(3): 343-350.(in Chinese)
贾承造,邹才能,李建忠,等. 中国致密油评价标准、主要类型、基本特征及资源前景[J]. 石油学报, 2012, 33(3): 343-350.
[14] Yang Zhengming, Xian Bao’an, Jiang Hanqiao, et al. The experimental study on coalbed gas reservoir using nuclear magnetic resonance technique[J]. China Coalbed Methane, 2009, 6(4): 20-23.(in Chinese)
杨正明,鲜保安,姜汉桥,等. 煤层气藏核磁共振技术实验研究[J]. 中国煤层气, 2009, 6(4): 20-23.
[15] Yao Yanbin, Liu Dameng, Cai Yidong, et al. Advanced characterization of pores and fractures in coals by nuclear magnetic resonance and X-ray computed tomography[J]. Scientia Sinica (Terrae), 2010, 40(11): 1598-1607. (in Chinese)
姚艳斌,刘大锰,蔡益栋,等. 基于NMR和X-CT的煤的孔裂隙精细定量表征[J]. 中国科学:地球科学, 2010, 40(11): 1598-1607.
[16] Wang Weimin, Zhao Gang, Gu Changchun, et al. Experiment and application of NMR technology on cuttings[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2005, 32(1): 56-59.(in Chinese)
王为民,赵刚,谷长春,等. 核磁共振岩屑分析技术的实验及应用研究[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2005, 32(1): 56-59.
[17] Zhou Yu, Wei Guoqi, Guo Hekun. Impact Factors Analysis and Decision Tree Correction of NMR Porosity Measurements[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2011, 35(3): 210-214.(in Chinese)
周宇,魏国齐,郭和坤. 核磁共振孔隙度影响因素分析与校准[J]. 测井技术, 2011, 35(3): 210-214.
[18] Guan Junfang, Hou Ruiyun. Coal pore properties of matrix & cleat and their porosity measurement methods[J]. Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power, 1999, 20(1): 24-28. (in Chinese)
管俊芳,侯瑞云. 煤储层基质孔隙和割理孔隙的特征及孔隙度的测定方法[J]. 华北水利水电学院学报, 1999, 20(1): 24-28.
[19] Sun Junchang, Yang Zhengming, Tang Ligen, et al. Study on distribution law of irreducible water andgas saturation of tight sandstone gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, 2011, 28(5): 377-383.(in Chinese)
孙军昌,杨正明,唐立根,等. 致密气藏束缚水分布规律及含气饱和度研究[J]. 深圳大学学报理工版, 2011, 28(5): 377-383.
[20] Wang Weimin, Guo Hekun, Ye Chaohui. The evaluation of development potential in low permeability oilfield by the aid of nmr movable fluid detecting technology[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2001, 22(6): 40-44.(in Chinese)
王为民,郭和坤,叶朝辉. 利用核磁共振可动流体评价低渗透油田开发潜力[J]. 石油学报, 2001, 22(6): 40-44.
[21] Li Haibo. Core Experimental Study of NMR T2 Cutoff Value[D]. Beijing: Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2008.(in Chinese)
李海波. 岩心核磁共振可动流体T2截止值实验研究[D]. 北京:中国科学院研究生院, 2008.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
Received:2013-01-19;Accepted:2013-04-13
Foundation: Special Major Science and Technology of CNPC (2012E-2601-04 )
Corresponding author:Senior engineer Guo Hekun. E-mail: nmrghk69@petrochina.com.cn
Citation:Guo Hekun, Liu Qiang, Li Haibo, et al. Microstructural characteristics of the Jurassic tight oil reservoirs in Sichuan Basin[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, 2013, 30(3): 306-312.(in Chinese)
基金项目:中国石油重大科技专项资助项目(2012E-2601-04)
作者简介:郭和坤(1969-),男(汉族),中国石油堪探开发研究院高级工程师. E-mail:nmrghk69@petrochina.com.cn
引文:郭和坤,刘强,李海波,等. 四川盆地侏罗系致密储层孔隙结构特征[J]. 深圳大学学报理工版,2013,30(3):306-312.
更新日期/Last Update: 2013-05-19