[1]陈义勇.城市社区公共空间活动量的影响因素[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2016,33(No.2(111-220)):180-187.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2016.02180]
 Chen Yiyong.Influential factors of the amount of community open space activity[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2016,33(No.2(111-220)):180-187.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2016.02180]
点击复制

城市社区公共空间活动量的影响因素()
分享到:

《深圳大学学报理工版》[ISSN:1000-2618/CN:44-1401/N]

卷:
第33卷
期数:
2016年No.2(111-220)
页码:
180-187
栏目:
土木建筑工程
出版日期:
2016-03-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Influential factors of the amount of community open space activity
文章编号:
201602011
作者:
陈义勇
深圳大学建筑与城市规划学院,深圳 518060
Author(s):
Chen Yiyong
College of Architecture and Urban Plan, Shenzhen University,Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong Province, P.R.China
关键词:
景观设计城市规划公共空间社区场地大小深圳华侨城
Keywords:
landscape architecture city planning open space community site size Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town
分类号:
TU 986
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1249.2016.02180
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
研究社区公共空间中,可达性、场地大小和吸引力对公共空间活动量的影响及作用机制. 以广东省深圳市华侨城社区为例,观察记录了社区内各公共空间4 d内的活动量,统计了各公共空间单元的场地面积、居住人口、就业人口和场地吸引力相对值,建立了影响公共空间活动量的单因素及多因素模型. 研究发现,公共空间面积、吸引力及可达性对社区公共空间活动量的影响显著;公共空间场地面积是影响公共空间活动的最重要因素,当社区公共空间单元面积为500~2 000 m2时,其利用效率较高;对于同等面积的社区公共空间单元,增加其吸引力比增强可达性更为重要. 研究认为,社区公共空间供应和布局中应以使用者需求为中心,不宜布置过大的公共空间,应化整为零,均衡布局,重视环境建设和设施的配置.
Abstract:
We explore the influence of accessibility, site area and attractiveness on the use of community open space. By setting a Shenzhen Overseas Chinese Town (OCT) community as the study case, we observe four-day activities in each open space of this community. The unit area, the resident population, employed population and the relative magnitude of field attractiveness of each open space are considered so as to allow for the establishment of single and multiple factor models that affect open space activity. The results confirm that area size, attractiveness, and accessibility of open spaces have significant effect on the use of community open spaces. The open space area is the chief factor affecting open space activity. When the unit area of a community open space is 500 m2 to 2 000 m2, its efficiency is high. For community open spaces with similar unit area, increasing their attractiveness is more important than enhancing their accessibility. Based on the results, this research suggests that the user needs should be considered primarily in designing the number and location of community open spaces. Relevant departments should attach considerable importance to environment-friendly construction and facility configuration, rather than a large space or excessive decoration for open spaces.

参考文献/References:

[1] Jiang Bin, Zhang Tian, Sullivan W C. Healthy cities: mechanisms and research questions regarding the impacts of urban green landscapes on public health and well-being[J]. Landscape Architecture Frontiers, 2015, 3(1): 24-35.
[2] Roovers P, Hermy M, Gulinck H. Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forest from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 59(3): 129-145.
[3] Grahn P, Stigsdotter U. Landscape planning and stress[J]. Urban Forestry &Urban Greening, 2003, 2(1): 1-18.
[4] Jensen F S, Koch N E. Twenty-five years of forest recreation research in Denmark and its influence on forest policy[J]. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2004, 19(4): 93-102.
[5] 韩见,叶成康,韩西丽. 北京市胡同社区户外环境对儿童感知及体力活动的影响——以钟楼湾社区为例[J]. 城市发展研究, 2013, 20(5): 1-4.
Han Jian, Ye Chengkang, Han Xili. The impact of neighborhood space in traditional residential on childrens’ perception and physical activities: a case study in Zhonglouwan neighborhood[J]. Urban Development Studies, 2013, 20(5): 1-4.(in Chinese)
[6] 杨振山,张慧,丁悦,等. 城市绿色空间研究内容与展望[J]. 地理科学进展,2015, 34(1): 18-29.
Yang Zhenshan, Zhang Hui, Ding Yue, et al. Progress and prospect on urban green space research[J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(1): 18-29.(in Chinese)
[7] Sanesi S, Chiarello F. Residents and urban green spaces: the case of Bari[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2006, 4(S3/4): 125-134.
[8] Yilmaz S, Zengin M, Yildiz N D. Determination of user profile at city parks: a sample from Turkey[J]. Building and Environment, 2007, 42(6): 2325-2332.
[9] Giles-Corti B, Broomhall M H, Knuiman M, et al. Increasing walking: how important is distance to, attractiveness, and size of public open space?[J]. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005, 28(S2): 169-176.
[10] Kaczynski A T, Potwarka L R, Smale B J A, et al. Association of parkland proximity with neighborhood and park-based physical activity: variations by gender and age[J]. Leisure Sciences, 2009, 31(2): 174-191.
[11] Talbot J F, Kaplan R. Judging the sizes of urban open areas: is bigger always better?[J].Landscape Journal, 1986, 5(2):83-92.
[12] 叶鹏,王浩,高非非. 基于GPS的城市公共空间环境行为调查研究方法初探——以合肥市胜利广场为例[J]. 建筑学报,2012(S2):28-33.
Ye Peng, Wang Hao, Gao Feifei. A preliminary study on the research method of urban public space environment and behavior based on GPS: a case study of Shengli Square in Hefei[J]. Architectural Journal, 2012(S2): 28-33.(in Chinese)
[13] 孙彤宇.从城市公共空间与建筑的耦合关系论城市公共空间的动态发展[J]. 城市规划学刊,2012(5): 82-91.
Sun Tongyu. The dynamic development of urban public space[J]. Urban Planning Forum, 2012(5): 82-91.(in Chinese)
[14] 陈义勇, 刘涛. 社区开放空间吸引力的影响因素探讨——基于深圳华侨城社区的调查[J].建筑学报, 2016(2): 107-112.
Chen Yiyong, Liu Tao. What attract people to come and stay in community public space: a case study of OCT, Shenzhen[J]. Architecture Journal, 2016(2): 107-112.(in Chinese)
[15] 赵永革. 城镇体系规划中城镇发展条件的双等差级数综合评价法[J]. 国土经济,1994(1):23-27.
Zhao Yongge. The use of double arithmetic progression method in urban system planning[J]. Territorial Economy, 1994(1): 23-27.(in Chinese)
[16] Koohsari M J, Mavoa S, Villanueva K, et al. Public open space, physical activity, urban design and public health: concepts, methods and research agenda[J]. Health & Place,2015, 33:75-82.
[17] Schipperijn J, Stigsdotter U K, Randrup T B, et al. Influences on the use of urban green space — a case study in Odense, Denmark[J]. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 2010, 9(1): 25-32.
[18] Schipperijn J, Ekholm O, Stigsdotter U K, et al. Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey[J]. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2010, 95(3): 130-137.
[19] 唐慧超,王萌萌,熊亮,等.城市公共空间多主体需求的关注度研究——以深圳华侨城生态广场为例[J].山东建筑大学学报,2009,24(3):233-237.
Tang Huichao, Wang Mengmeng, Xiong Liang, et al. A research on users’ demands of city public space: a case of China OCT Ecological Square in Shenzhen[J]. Journal of Shandong Jianzhu University, 2009, 24(3):233-237.(in Chinese)
[20] Chen Yiyong, Liu Tao, Liu Weibin. Increasing the use of large-scale public open spaces: a case study of the North Central Axis Square in Shenzhen, China[J]. Habitat International, 2016, 53(4): 66-77.

相似文献/References:

[1]吕 慎,田 锋.城市综合客运换乘枢纽选址模型研究[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2007,24(2):194.
 LU Shen and TIAN Feng.Location model of urban passenger intermodal transfer terminals[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2007,24(No.2(111-220)):194.
[2]林燕,黄骏.城市滨水地段生态景观整治构思——兼谈广东增江两岸景观整治工程实践[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2011,28(No.4(283-376)):373.
 LIN Yan and HUANG Jun.Renovation of ecological landscape of waterfront[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2011,28(No.2(111-220)):373.
[3]刘瑞雪,彭媛媛.基于公众感知的城市滨海绿地植物景观评价[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2017,34(No.4(331-440)):385.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2017.04385]
 Liu Ruixue and Peng Yuanyuan.Evaluation of plant landscape in the seaside green land based on public perception[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2017,34(No.2(111-220)):385.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2017.04385]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
Received:2015-11-23;Accepted:2016-02-21
Foundation:National Natural Science Foundation of China (51408367)
Corresponding author:Lecturer Chen Yiyong.E-mail:chenyiy@szu.edu.cn
Citation:Chen Yiyong.Influential factors of the amount of community open space activity[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, 2016, 33(2): 180-187.(in Chinese)
基金项目:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51408367)
作者简介:陈义勇(1985—),男,深圳大学讲师、博士. 研究方向:城市公共空间规划与设计. E-mail:chenyiy@szu.edu.cn
引文:陈义勇.城市社区公共空间活动量的影响因素[J]. 深圳大学学报理工版,2016,33(2):180-187.
更新日期/Last Update: 2016-03-04