[1]管民生,杜宏彪,曾庆立,等.远场地震作用下长周期结构的基底剪重比[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2017,34(No.5(441-550)):488-494.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2017.05488]
 Guan Minsheng,Du Hongbiao,Zeng Qingli,et al.Seismic base shear coefficients of long-period structures subjected to far-field ground motions[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2017,34(No.5(441-550)):488-494.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2017.05488]
点击复制

远场地震作用下长周期结构的基底剪重比()
分享到:

《深圳大学学报理工版》[ISSN:1000-2618/CN:44-1401/N]

卷:
第34卷
期数:
2017年No.5(441-550)
页码:
488-494
栏目:
土木建筑工程
出版日期:
2017-09-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismic base shear coefficients of long-period structures subjected to far-field ground motions
文章编号:
201705008
作者:
管民生1杜宏彪1曾庆立1蔡威1崔杰2
1)深圳大学土木工程学院,广东深圳518060
2)广州大学工程抗震研究中心,广东广州 510405
Author(s):
Guan Minsheng1 Du Hongbiao1 Zeng Qingli1 Cai Wei1 and Cui Jie2
1) College of Civil Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, Guangdong Province, P.R.China
2) Earthquake Engineering Research & Test Center, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510405, Guangdong Province, P.R.China
关键词:
建筑科学地下建筑远场地震动近场地震动长周期结构基底剪重比
Keywords:
building science substructure far-field ground motion near-field ground motion long-period structure seismic base shear coefficient
分类号:
TU 973
DOI:
10.3724/SP.J.1249.2017.05488
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究在峰值加速度与峰值速度调幅方式下,远场地震作用对长周期结构基底剪重比的影响. 选取了3条远场地震波和1条近场地震波,建立了6个规则型钢混凝土框架-核心筒结构模型,按照2种调幅方式分别进行设防水准下的动力时程分析. 结果表明,峰值加速度调幅方式下,远场地震作用下结构的剪重比明显大于近场地震,但两者差异在峰值速度调幅方式下较小;两种调幅方式下,相比较近场地震,远场地震对长周期结构位移反应的影响更为明显. 长周期结构在峰值速度调幅方式下的顶点位移和基底剪力均大于峰值加速度调幅下的结果,说明长周期结构对于速度谱的敏感性要大于加速度谱. 建议长周期结构时程分析采用峰值速度调幅方式.
Abstract:
The paper aims to investigate the effect of far-field ground motions with two amplitude modulation means, i.e. peak ground acceleration (PGA) and peak ground velocity (PGV), on seismic base shear coefficients of long-period structures. Three far-field earthquake records and one typical near-field accelerogram are chosen as input ground motions. Six steel reinforced concrete frame-core wall structures are designed and studied through dynamic time history analyses with a set of four selected ground motions scaled to the fortification earthquake level. Numerical results show that, by scaling PGA, the seismic base shear coefficients under far-field ground motions are significantly larger than those of the near-field ground motion. However, in the way of scaling PGV, the difference between two types of earthquake records is minor. The structural top displacements are more effected by the far-field ground motions in comparison with those of the near-field ground motion under the two scaling methods. It is also found that the two structural responses, the top displacement and the seismic base shear coefficient in the way of scaling PGV are larger than those of scaling PGA, which indicates that the long-period structures is more sensitive to the velocity spectrum than the acceleration spectrum. As a result, the time history analysis is suggested to be used as the PGV amplitude modulation manner for long-period structures.

参考文献/References:

[1] Pavel F, Vacareanu R, Cioflan C, et al. Spectral characteristics of strong ground motions from intermediate-depth vrancea seismic source[J]. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 2014, 104(6): 2842-2850.
[2] 徐龙军, 胡进军, 谢礼立. 特殊长周期地震动的参数特征研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2008,28(6):20-27.
Xu Longjun, Hu Jinjun, Xie Lili. On characteristics of ground motion parameters for special long-period ground motions[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2008, 28(6):20-27.(in Chinese)
[3] 苏彦兵. 长周期地震动作用下超限高层结构抗震性能研究[D]. 兰州:兰州理工大学, 2013.
Su Yanbing. Investigation on seismic performance of a tall building beyond the code-specification under long-period ground motions[D]. Lanzhou:Lanzhou University of Technology, 2013.(in Chinese)
[4] 孙飞飞, 唐熙. 中长周期不利地震动研究[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2014, 34(8):132-138.
Sun Feifei, Tang Xi. Study on medium-to-long-period severest ground motions[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics, 2014, 34(8):132-138.(in Chinese)
[5] Celebi M, Ulusoy H S, Nakata N. Responses of a tall building in Los Angeles, California, as inferred from local and distant earthquakes[J]. Earthquake Spectra, 2016, 32(3): 1821-1843.
[6] 刘阳,刘文光,杨巧荣,等. 长周期结构弹塑性能量谱模型及其应用研究[J].建筑结构学报,2014,35(8):15-22.
Liu Yang, Liu Wenguang, Yang Qiaorong, et al. Study and application of elasto-plastic energy spectrum model for long-period structure[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014,35(8):15-22.(in Chinese)

[7] 韩建平, 苏彦兵. 长周期地震动输入下某超限高层结构反应分析:以汶川地震和日本东北地震记录为例[J]. 建筑结构, 2014,44(18):59-62.
Han Jianping, Su Yanbing. Seismic response analysis of an out-of-code high-rise building under long-period ground motion: case studies of Wenchuan Earthquake and Japan Tohoku Earthquake records[J]. Building Structure, 2014, 44(18):59-62.(in Chinese)
[8] 蔡新江, 王彬, 田石柱. 高层建筑长周期地震反应子结构试验近似模拟方法[J].防灾减灾工程学报,2015,35(4): 536-542.
Cai Xinjiang, Wang Bin, Tian Shizhu. Approximate simulation method for long-period seismic response of tall buildings based on substructure test[J]. Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, 2015, 35(4): 536- 542.(in Chinese)
[9] Denolle M A, Dunham E M, Prieto G A, et al. Strong ground motion prediction using virtual earthquakes[J]. Science, 2014, 343(6169): 399-403.
[10] 王亚勇. 关于设计反应谱、时程法和能量方法的探讨[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2000, 21(1):21-28.
Wang Yayong. A review of seismic response spectra, time history analysis and energy method[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2000, 21(1):21-28.(in Chinese)
[11] 肖从真,徐培福,杜义欣,等. 超高层建筑考虑长周期地震影响的另一种控制方法[J].土木工程学报,2014,47(2): 12-21.
Xiao Congzhen, Xu Peifu, Du Yixin, et al. Another controlling method on long-period seismic response for super high-rise buildings[J].China Civil Engineering Journal, 2014, 47(2):12-21.(in Chinese)
[12] Takewaki I, Fujita K, Yoshitomi S. Uncertainties in long-period ground motion and its impact on building structural design: case study of the 2011 Tohoku (Japan) earthquake[J]. Engineering Structures, 2013, 49:119-134.

[13] 李恒, 李龙安, 冯谦. 用位移反应谱研究长周期设计地震反应谱[J]. 地震工程与工程振动, 2012,32(4):47-53.
Li Heng, Li Long’an, Feng Qian. Seismic design spectra in long-period from spectral displacement analyses[J]. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2012,32(4):47-53.(in Chinese)
[14] 卢啸, 甄伟, 陆新征, 等. 最小地震剪力系数对超高层建筑结构抗震性能的影响[J].建筑结构学报,2014,35(5): 88-94.
Lu Xiao, Zhen Wei, Lu Xinzheng, et al. Influence of minimum shear force coefficient on seismic performance of super-tall buildings[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014,35(5):88-94.(in Chinese)
[15] Guan M S, Du H B, Cui J, et al. Adjustment of minimum seismic shear coefficient considering site effects for long-period structures[J]. Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 2016, 13(3): 304-312.
[16] 汪大绥,周建龙,姜文伟. 超高结构地震动剪力系数限值研究[J]. 建筑结构,2012,42(5): 24-27.
Wang Dasui, Zhou Jianlong, Jiang Wenwei. Research on seismic shear gravity ratio limit for super high-rise buildings higher than 500m[J]. Building Structure, 2012, 42(5):24-27.(in Chinese)
[17] 伍云天,姜凯旋,杨永斌,等. 中美超限高层建筑性能化抗震设计方法对比分析[J]. 建筑结构学报, 2015,36(2): 19- 26.
Wu Yuntian, Jiang Kaixuan, Yang Yongbin, et al. Comparative study on performance-based seismic design of RC tall buildings beyond code limits in China and United States[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2015,36(2):19-26.(in Chinese)
[18] GB50011—2010 建筑抗震设计规范[S].
GB50011—2010 Code for seismic design of buildings[S].(in Chinese)
[19] 方小丹,魏琏,周靖.长周期结构地震反应的特点与反应谱[J].建筑结构学报,2014,35(3):16-23.
Fang Xiaodan, Wei Lian, Zhou Jing. Characteristics of earthquake response for long-period structures and response spectrum[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2014, 35(3):16-23.(in Chinese)
[20] JGJ3—2010 高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程[S].
JGJ3—2010 Technical specification for concrete structures of tall building[S].(in Chinese)
[21] 裴星洙, 廖述清, 张立, 等. 基于建筑抗震设计规范的设计用地震动分析[J]. 世界地震工程, 2006, 22(2): 154- 160.
Pei Xingzhu , Liao Shuqing , Zhang Li, et al. Analyses of seismic waves for building structure design based on the design code of earthquake resistant structures[J]. World Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 22(2):154-160.(in Chinese)
[22] 沈麒,杨沈. 中日建筑抗震规范抗震设计比较[J]. 工程抗震与加固改造,2012,34(4):102-106.
Shen Qi, Yang Shen. Comparison of Chinese and Japanese seismic design of seismic design code[J]. Earthquake Resistant Engineering and Retrofitting, 2012, 34(4): 102- 106.(in Chinese)

相似文献/References:

[1]刘旭红,李俊彦,黄健文,等.环境促进教育的现代幼儿园建筑创作[J].深圳大学学报理工版,2017,34(No.4(331-440)):415.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2017.04415]
 Liu Xuhong,Li Junyan,et al.Architectural design and research on modern kindergarten based on environment cultivation view[J].Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering,2017,34(No.5(441-550)):415.[doi:10.3724/SP.J.1249.2017.04415]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
Received:2017-03-03;Accepted:2017-06-09
Foundation:Intellectual Innovation Program of Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Committee (JCYJ20160331114415945,JCYJ20150324141711689)
Corresponding author:Lecture Guan Minsheng.E-mail:msguan@szu.edu.cn
Citation:Guan Minsheng, Du Hongbiao, Zeng Qingli, et al.Seismic base shear coefficients of long-period structures subjected to far-field ground motions[J]. Journal of Shenzhen University Science and Engineering, 2017, 34(5): 488-494.(in Chinese)
基金项目:深圳市科技基础研究资助项目 (JCYJ20160331114415 945, JCYJ20150324141711689)
作者简介:管民生(1979—),男,深圳大学讲师、博士. 研究方向:工程抗震.E-mail:msguan@szu.edu.cn
引文:管民生,杜宏彪,曾庆立,等.远场地震作用下长周期结构的基底剪重比[J]. 深圳大学学报理工版,2017,34(5):488-494.
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-09-11